🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

In Europe, a growing chorus of countries are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our youngsters' youth". A law is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have stated that an similar ban is "a potential tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has called on the legislature to pass a bill raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has suggested a related action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised families to block their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic motion calling for a ban for minors except if guardian approval is provided. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these services, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a good first step," stated the European lawmaker behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "supported by strong data".

Earlier, momentum built behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the government pledged to further research the topic.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after viewing harmful online content suggests that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to create tools that are safe and age appropriate for minors," stated a leading child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, action is largely happening at the regional level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule capping under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with any further use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed measures mandating guardian approval for minors to set up social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from various figures to copy Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Apart from these regions, additional states are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world bodies take a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even backfire". The body notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

As this worldwide discussion evolves, the steps of Australia and others show that states globally are no longer willing to delay for the industry to self-regulate.